In contrast to the current Chinese building method, we learn from vernacular construction. Use of low-cost material, low-tech handmade tradition, and recycled materials are seeking to develop into an important transformation. We emphasize in combination the traditional vernacular method and modern professional technology, to push the improvements on them for future study and implementation.

To keep the balance of nature and dwelling space, morality is an important consideration in creating small structures. A large population is currently migrating into cities, who are often good craftsmen and can be good workers for the new constructions. The promotion of indigenous material and craftsmanship would additionally push for more social justice and equality between urban and rural areas.

Current Chinese architecture pays attention to new construction rather than maintenance and management of natural resources. We tested some maintenance-free methods here in the experimental small structures. Indigenous buildings require less maintenance, have less impact on the natural environment, and are more energy efficient. Use of local natural materials reflects long-term environmental concerns.

Large-scale urban renewal brings large-scale demolition and produces a large amount of debris. They can be recycled and reused in the experimental buildings. Natural materials like clay also can reduce cost in rural areas. These suggestions are well received by the client prior to construction. The economical aspects are proven through 1:1 scale tests on site under the direction of the designer.

The adaptation and learning of indigenous architecture respects and preserves the local culture. It is not only technical but fundamental to spatial and environmental creation. In contrast with modern Chinese architects who almost all use western models, the FHS are experimental and reflect an aesthetic that is unusually non-western and idiosyncratic, and should serve as a reference for the future.