Circular Materials & Building Components
With the enormous growth in demand for building materials and depletion of primary resources, the re-use of materials and components is an important way of reducing the environmental impact of building and construction.
Linear to circular flows
Decoupling materials from resource depletion
Beyond take-make-throw to designing for re-use
Our resource-intensive construction practices are speeding up the depletion of primary resources such as gravel, sand, steel, wood, and water. Building materials and products come at a staggering environmental cost, when the acumulated impacts throughout their lifecycle is considered from extraction and production through construction and the end-of-service phases. The management of materials that aims to keep materials in the loop for longer decreases pressure on our resources, and this essentially means employing materials that provide durability and flexibility of use, and that can be easily disassembled, reconditioned, and re-used at the end of their lifecycle.
Modular midrise housing, Vancouver, Canada
The management of materials that aims to keep materials in the loop for longer decreases pressure on our resources, and this essentially means employing materials that provide durability and flexibility of use, and that can be easily disassembled, reconditioned, and re-used at the end of their lifecycle.
Avoiding the disposal of construction materials is a viable way to minimize loss of ecologic and economic value. It also means designing for less material use. Considering an average life expectancy of 40-60 years for a building, the materials and the design decisions we make today will have a decisive impact long into the future. Demand of building materials is also set to increase, with a projected 280 billion square meters of floor area to be built globally by 2060, which in turn makes the case for circularity and decarbonization of the built environment.
Building material recycling
Reducing the demand for raw materials
Saving energy and emissions by reusing building materials and components
Being able to recirculate cementitious materials and steel scrap from construction and demolition waste is another proven strategy that decreases the amount of raw material used by the most impactful industry materials. Albeit less effective, as remanufacturing with recycled aggregates is still an energy and water intensive process.
Biobased materials have clear advantages when it comes to embodied energy and embodied carbon that is lower than any manufactured material. They are circular in that they are produced by agricultural and forestry by-products. In some cases, whenever kept pure and in absence of chemical treatments and additives, they can be safely returnable to the biosphere. The case for biobased materials is even stronger when we look at their performance capabilities: reduced heat transfer, optimum thermal and acoustic insulation properties, moisture control, biodegradability, and carbon absorbing properties. The purer the material, the better. Avoiding composites and keeping dry connections for easy demountability ensure an optimum circularity performance.
1 Triton Square
The refurbishment of 1 Triton Square by ARUP has allowed the removal, refurbishment, and reinstallation of over 3,000m2 of façade, comprising over 25,000 separate parts. This approach alone saved over 2,400 tonnes of carbon and represented a 66% cost saving when compared to a new façade. The project is an example of how to trigger circularity by design actions on different layers of the building. Different layers of buildings having different wear and tear and thus longevity, a factor that designers must consider when designing with reuse in mind.
Aiming for long-lasting products and ease of maintenance and repair is also paramount. Extending the lifecycle of materials through supply take back schemes or digital databases are a few of the strategies that can be pursued to maintain building materials and products stocks in use. Several technology solutions are available currently for traceability, or to keep track of materials and products during their lifecycle.
A good hierarchy of materials, listed by global warming potential, is represented in the Construction Materials Pyramid. The pyramid is based on the well-known food pyramid and developed digitally by the Centre for Industrialized Architecture (CINARK) at the Royal Danish Academy.
Cradle to cradle
Recirculated materials and material declarations
What if building materials become nutrients for biological or technical cycles?
Moving beyond cradle-to-grave and industry-as-usual, we can imagine a near future world where all our materials can be recirculated in a non-toxic manner, for the benefit of humans and the biosphere at large. Cradle to Cradle, or C2C, advocates for a design philosophy whereby design processes are entirely modelled by nature’s processes. In nature, the concept of waste is nonexistent, and outputs of natural cycles are used as inputs for other natural cycles. Keeping manufactured products separated from nature-based materials is of the utmost importance, in order to maximize the circular potential of each of the two distinct nutrient metabolisms. Emulating natural processes means, first and foremost, working with products that are safe, fully circular and responsible, even compostable. This calls for questioning the toxicity levels of materials that are currently used in construction and that impact our health, and that of our ecosystems.
Being less bad is simply not good enough! Michael Braungart
The design concept, initiated by Professor Michael Braungart and architect William McDonough and illustrated in their 2002 bestseller Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things, has originated a today well-established health certification for materials, the Cradle to Cradle Certified Products Program.
Declare, administered by the International Living Future Institute, is another established material transparency declaration, or “nutrition label” for construction materials and products, being also an important advocacy tool for more responsible material production and industry change.
The product-as-service model
Circular business models support the industry to find solutions to new manufacturing, construction, de-construction, maintenance, and repair processes. Servitization or the “product as a service” model, is amongst the most established circular business models today. The root of servitization has been outlined by Professor Walter Stahel in The Performance Economy, where he makes the point that focusing on the performance outcomes of a product, rather than on the product itself, leads to a long-term perspective, with retained resource value over time, less material use, optimized maintenance and increased lifespan.
The applications of this model have been explored and successfully implemented by several building product producers on the construction market, ranging from electric fixtures, all the way to façade systems.
Further reading on circular materials and building components
Proposition for Circular Construction
“Upcycle through the whole materials supply chain”
Stuart Smith on how to “Reconfigure Parts”
The Materials Book
Monitoring material flows and their regenerative values
The Materials Book
Returning to the fold
Reuse and recycling: Materializing a circular construction